Posted: 28 Oct 2015, 22:18
(Seebarting is a full stack technology. He does it to his opinions as well as his posts!)
Just give me a nice thread to work.deskthority
mechanical keyboard authority
https://www.deskthority.net/
Post your deskthority header images here
Page 53 of 76
Posted: 28 Oct 2015, 22:26
Posted: 07 Nov 2015, 21:16
Whenever I see this:
I must think of that:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
I must think of that:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------>
Posted: 07 Nov 2015, 22:04
Well green 7bit, I can relate. But on the right hand side there are some "slightly" different objects! You of all people should be able to distinguish keycaps from corny nude 70s chicks. 
Or are you trying to tell us you want that cheesy header back?
Or are you trying to tell us you want that cheesy header back?Posted: 07 Nov 2015, 22:09
The fake vegetation clone job is the bit I object to.
Posted: 07 Nov 2015, 22:11
Right and not enough nudity. If we're gonna have that then with proper T&A!
Posted: 07 Nov 2015, 22:17
Posted: 07 Nov 2015, 22:19
That's nice but that's NOT what I mean and you know it. You want me to post examples...
- 5326bca323ec42ad80422a8ae6a29681-800.png (2.15 KiB) Viewed 4481 times
Posted: 07 Nov 2015, 22:52
Work in progress Mu, don't use any of this!
- alphameric1.jpg (257.02 KiB) Viewed 4422 times
- alphameric2.jpg (233.15 KiB) Viewed 4466 times
- alphameric4.jpg (253 KiB) Viewed 4454 times
- ergopro1.jpg (217.92 KiB) Viewed 4437 times
- ergopro2.jpg (288.55 KiB) Viewed 4435 times
Posted: 07 Nov 2015, 23:04
Not bad actually. I like this theme.
Posted: 07 Nov 2015, 23:20
I shot a ton of ergo pro pics. That keyboard is quite photogenic.
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 01:14
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 01:34
Each one of the three would be great, if given the same quality treatment as these gentlemen:
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 01:41
Well to use a British expression, "I couldn't be arsed."
OK, since we have blue and red, how about yellow?
OK, since we have blue and red, how about yellow?
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 01:43
Nah, needs to be one header: one photo. Got links for the source photos so we can try coming up with something too?
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 01:47
Source photos:
The problem is that they're all too vertical to crop a decent size without (..as you always bitch about..) being "too cropped".
The problem is that they're all too vertical to crop a decent size without (..as you always bitch about..) being "too cropped".
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 01:52
Great stuff! Nice resolutions to work with. Let's see who can make them header worthy…
Probably not me. I didn't have much luck with my own attempts at Univac photos before.
Probably not me. I didn't have much luck with my own attempts at Univac photos before.
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 03:45
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 16:26
I like this one with the overlay a lot mr_a500.
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 16:33
Which one? Original or seebarted version?
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 16:35
The first top one.
Actually, the second one works better in contrast against our logo. Might need a bit more contrast.
Actually, the second one works better in contrast against our logo. Might need a bit more contrast.
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 16:48
vote for first top one, however I prefer to see it in original greyscale or sepia 
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 16:59
How about a quick crop like this?
- TEC terminal header.jpg (88.17 KiB) Viewed 4281 times
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 17:01
"no go", unless you take care of all that noise @@
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 17:02
No way. Too blurry. We used to have more fuzzy headers in rotation, but I ruthlessly executed them. And I'll do it again!
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 17:10
these are vintage photos, they will always have some noise and blur.
here's with less noise:
actually I like to see the old photos with the noise/artifacts, as it gives all the vintage looking which rules
here's with less noise:
actually I like to see the old photos with the noise/artifacts, as it gives all the vintage looking which rules
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 17:13
I've got to say I don't like the repetition. I'd much prefer an extension of the solid background colour instead. That can work great, when done well. And I don't know how to do it well myself. Know it when I see it though!
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 17:20
I like the sepia version. I normally hate repetition too, but I can't think of another way to fill that space. I did have this originally, but deleted it because I liked the closeup better.
Blank is just too plain.
Blank is just too plain.
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 17:26
Works beautifully for the red and blue ones though. Maybe with a subtle texture. But no embedded secondary photography.
Posted: 08 Nov 2015, 17:30