deskthority

sorry guys. this is an open forum which discusses an open wiki.


(Abstract) Daedalus, I don't think Daniel implied that you are lying, only that there is nothing to stop you from lying, unless there is a source in the image description. Because even if you lied about the images, the source supports ...

−1 Troll

even though webwit is right in that: this is a dead thread, let me further add the following:

had you admit, calling my edits ''ill-conceived'' was wrong on your part, for what else would i edit your articles, had not been for the simple fact that your articles were orphans indeed ...

Is there any value in having copypasta pages that duplicate Google Patents? It's an awful lot of work replicating so many patents, and unless someone is prepared to keep at it, day and night for months on end, it seems like it's best to just refer to Google Patents or some other reliable patent ...

En otras palabras:

altura = perfecta, adecuada, apropiada, utilizable
ancho = pudiese ser mejorado, pero no obstante, aceptable
plástico = POM

right. most citations in that book are from wikipedia. it seems to me that at five hundred plus pages in a final printed form, and at twenty nine dollars and fifty cents, is either because shaik is stupid and wanted to make a quick buck, or has edited the articles in question in wikipedia.

not a thirteen yr old though. his name is samee shaik from pakistan, trainee at comstar karachi. i guess at five hundred twelve pages with most referenced materials from wikipedia, is somewhat reckless to say the least.

Don't jump too hastily to the conclusion that something which appears wrong, really is wrong. It may not be.

Look who's talking. Ha! You make my day! It's wrong or it's not. So it must be wrong what you did. Because I was working in the orphaned pages and nothing else.

I think a summary would ...

Whaddya mean "You know what Soarer?" - I'm just asking questions and giving my thoughts. There will be no peace 'til you calm down a bit - no matter whether you are right or wrong.

sorry about that, but the "you know what" was related to the orphaned page filter discussion over at mwusers.com ...

Is there a way to get it to list pages that are both orphaned AND uncategorised?

Soarer, I don't know about that. And it doesn't matter either way.

I fixed two orphaned pages. More than that, but let's focus on The Kinesis Evolution and the Kinesis Maxim. So those two pages were no longer ...

Just for the record, I really wonder since when this discussion is based on the Special:Uncategorized pages

These are the orphaned pages (74) as of now
And this is the list of Uncategorized pages

WRT Futaba, you're confused. I did not like what you'd done to the Futaba linear switch page, but I left your change alone. (The only change I made was to correct the parts-per-switch comment you added, when I found a part that I'd missed.)

Who said otherwise? I already said that "Luckily there ...

Besides, if the category listed four keyboards, and I added two (so the orphaned pages are no longer orphaned), why not add the other two keyboards, since it will not affect the categories for the keyboards...

forget it, this is a circular argument. I sound like a broken record.

hey Jbert, I had noticed you appeared as logged in, but hadn't seen you around, since we exchanged opinions about an ol' fashioned typewriter, and a layout I think, like two years ago, back in gh. Good to see you. I read the link from mwusers.com

Nonetheless, the orphaned page will have no link ...

Icarium wrote:I think it might be more constructive to have discussions like this in the discussion section of the appropriate pages.

Icarium. It makes no difference. Since according to Daniel, my edits were "ill-conceived" and I pretty much messed up the page for the Futaba switch.

"Ill conceived edits".

Gracias! For some reason I was thinking the same of you when you decided to undid what I edited.

If you see the last edits I did "ill-conceived", I cared less whether those edits were actually yours or mine. If you see my edits, I was concerned of the orphaned pages that ...

You just reverted what I did. Even though you could have added the two Kinesis keyboards to the product's section. But no.

Funny thing is I was trying to fix something that was long overdue. But it's okay.

You could argue that it would be better if the category could be inlined, i.e. the category entries automatically transcluded onto the page (so it would resemble a category page, essentially, without being in the Category: namespace). This may be possible, never tried. I never considered it that ...

Bottom line is that the products' section is followed by a list of products. But the list of products is actually empty, because there are no products to list, only after the list is linked to another list, then there is a product list.

Anyway. Have a good one.

Here is the page in question, or article, or whatever formal term is used.

kinesis modified.png

And here is the article with the revision.

kinesis page.png



The list of products of Kinesis Corporation is delegated to a link, so your far foggy rationale manages to provide a link that says ...

...so you could type onto the device and shuffle categories around as you please, is that link justifiable?

Eventually I will get it over, but could you provide me with your far foggy rationale as to why is that the case?

Don't tell me to understand the wiki, because it ain't about religion, or ...

= is harder to reach because it is in the middle.

Yes, no doubt.

Control-C is way off

I can't follow you, because if Ctrl is capslock and say C is on the top row, is not way off, since alternating hands is ergonomically sound.

Control-W must be typed now with the right hand
Why a mouse ...

What metric is this?

the only metric I see here is the likability process, for if an individual is likable, it factors out the acceptance rate of a proven method, in which case we ought to listen more to obfuscated ideas of collectors.

the only one I truly miss here, is kbdfr, with his ...

What is the point in spreading out the () etc.

***complex argumentation***
You could have also argued: Mess a bit, mess it all.

Not my cup of tea. Also I wonder which programming language it should be good for ...
:?

what is your argument then? So far I have only read half-cooked rants.

let ...

Jmneuv wrote:Bold copying indeed, a little disturbing.

Just somewhat out of topic.

Isn't the rate of opportunism slightly higher in China than elsewhere?

p. s. thank you to brilliant mathematicians like Shing-Tung Yau, Xi-Ping Zhu and Huai-Dong for setting such low standards.

What is the point in spreading out the () etc.

Because this layout separates faulty reasoning from logical applicability, the latter being the foremost priority of its author, since the parenthesis are the same width, or at the same distance of separation than your hands, from the home row ...

pdk has been around for awhile. but that's besides the point.

from the home row, if you extend your fingers to the upper row, pdk arranged the keys in such a way, so all your fingers, will land in the most special characters' usable keys , e.g. (index) {left ring and left middle} [left pinky and ...

im wondering if the key caps on both versions (smk and alps) are the same.

and then a side by side view of both key caps (model m and apple) wouldn't hurt either. perhaps the caps are to be blamed for my refusal to use model m.

Icarium wrote:Isn't there an alps version of this?

am almost sure it was the alps version

On that? That's a horrible keyboard. That's the sort of cheap rubbish that left me wondering year after year why all keyboards sucked …

for some unknown reason i could type forever in it.

not so much in this thing. maybe i'm more delicate as years have passed lol