Glad We're Not MetaFilter
Posted: 23 May 2014, 00:59
They're in trouble. Matt Haughey has a nice writeup about it here:
https://medium.com/technology-musings/941d15ec96f0
Basically, MetaFilter relies completely on Google for traffic and income, and the last few years Google's been really fucking around with them. What a surprise. As Marco Arment says, don't expect any better from a monopolist. Even when, for whatever reason, everyone else does.
Anyway, this bit made me think of how we deal with comment spam on DT:
https://medium.com/technology-musings/941d15ec96f0
Basically, MetaFilter relies completely on Google for traffic and income, and the last few years Google's been really fucking around with them. What a surprise. As Marco Arment says, don't expect any better from a monopolist. Even when, for whatever reason, everyone else does.
Anyway, this bit made me think of how we deal with comment spam on DT:
Scale is probably the main thing keeping this at bay, here at DT. But am I glad we don't rely on Google for cash. The healthiest community is the one that funds itself.Google calling links found on MetaFilter “inorganic” is troubling. We have a staff of six full-time moderators in five timezones throughout the world (two are in Europe) to make sure zero spam ends up on the site. We have a variety of internal tools that help us track all spam down: views of all activity by new users that contain links and lists of comments added to old questions that had a link in them (two patterns we found comment spammers trying in the past). Moderators scan every new user of the site looking for telltale signs of a possible spammer and we have ways of marking potentially problematic accounts behind-the-scenes that give us additional view of their activity on the site later on. Those views are checked every few hours and when we occasionally find people posting comment spam, we remove it and ban the accounts immediately. We also have a robust flagging system used by members of the site so they can alert us instantly when spotted and we take the same actions on spammy additions. We have a total of over ten million comments across on all our sites combined and we spend so much time and energy tracking the few problem comments down that I would be hard-pressed to find even a single public comment that could be considered comment spam.