Page 1 of 1
Size comparison of F and M
Posted: 19 Jul 2016, 22:06
by elecplus
- IMG_5468.JPG (514.06 KiB) Viewed 1741 times
Not the best picture and the 2 back ones are not complete, but I was surprised that the unsaver is the same width as a regular Model M. Twice as heavy though!
One of my dealer buddies said he would go look on the shelves, if he had a pic of what to look for.
Posted: 19 Jul 2016, 23:12
by Chyros
Yeah, that's why they call it the Unsaver — it's a space-saving design of a ginormous keyboard, so it's not small at all xD .
Even the SSK isn't that small a board...
Posted: 20 Jul 2016, 00:05
by LewisR
It (unsaver) looks slightly wider than the XT. Having the alphas closer to the center like the XT makes a big difference in ergonomics though. I'd much rather deal with the Unsaver than the fullsize M just for that.
I am one who had to switch to TKL's for most of my computer usage since my mouse arm was having shoulder pain and those few inches or cm make a big difference in comfort for me.
Posted: 20 Jul 2016, 00:19
by elecplus
What XT? The first is an SSK, the 2nd the unsaver, the 3rd a standard sized Model M, and the last is an F122.
Posted: 20 Jul 2016, 01:39
by LewisR
elecplus wrote: What XT? The first is an SSK, the 2nd the unsaver, the 3rd a standard sized Model M, and the last is an F122.
Not in your pic, but I compared it with my XT and M.
Posted: 20 Jul 2016, 01:56
by LewisR
- xt.jpg (445.11 KiB) Viewed 1641 times
Posted: 20 Jul 2016, 07:11
by alh84001
[nitpick]if you take XT's "ears" into account, they are pretty much the same though[/nitpick]
Posted: 20 Jul 2016, 08:51
by y11971alex
alh84001 wrote: [nitpick]if you take XT's "ears" into account, they are pretty much the same though[/nitpick]
This is actually quite true, since you cannot really retract them save complete removal.