DT Usability Analysis Survey (Report and Conclusions available)
Posted: 14 Mar 2016, 18:11
Hello, I'm a student in ISEP (Instituto Superior de Engenharia do Porto) in Portugal and I need to do a work of usability analysis. This work will be done by me and a friend (not a user in this forum).
THANK YOU ALL THAT PARTICIPATE
Its was a simple work, just to start using the R.
So the report as I said: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B1sOO ... XJHbDhsalE
I know the .pdf is in Portuguese but the graphics and tables are in English. If you know something about statistic you will understand.
Conclusion using google translate:
The results obtained were overall very positive having no less than average 3 (neutral value), and the general opinion and the average general features above or equal to 4.The general opinion was pretty consistent with only three variables in the standard deviation was higher than 1. That said we think the conclusions to be drawn must be based just on what should be improved.
Regarding the overall structure of the forum, the structure that had worse price was Deskthority Bottom Bar which had 3 negative responses, one of the worst. also presented much indifference, with 13 responses neutral value.
On the general features of the forum the issues with worse prices were the find, edit, remove topics or posts and should be the first features to be improved.
Regarding the features of the members considered worse was to find members taking
even a minimum score of response. All features of this category had several answers negative value (<3 values).
Broadly should be noted that the 27 replies on the ease of use only one was neutral, and all the other higher.[/spoiler]
Also in the last pages you can get the R script and a copy of the .csv file
Critics & Suggestions (From members)
-Needs dark themes and multi-quotes
-In my opinion there should be a tab next to "Spy, Top topics Wiki, IRC, search" which lists all the threads i took part at. I dont want to be notified about each topic i answerd per mail, but to see them would be a really nice feature.
The site is quite good in its current incarnation. There are a few things that could be streamlined, such as images being auto-spoilered in quotes and the spy functionality putting some oddball things on the feed.
-messaging could be improved and marketplace is very hard to understand
-As far as forums go, it’s a pretty good implementation. phpBB tables remain a living nightmare (adding tabular content to a post is for all extents and purposes simply impossible), and there are some weird bugs relating to time zones when not logged in (like "Last post: Today, 23:50" at 08:25 — the man with a really long scarf called and wants a word) but generally, not much to complain about.
Spoiler:
Its was a simple work, just to start using the R.
So the report as I said: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B1sOO ... XJHbDhsalE
I know the .pdf is in Portuguese but the graphics and tables are in English. If you know something about statistic you will understand.
Conclusion using google translate:
The results obtained were overall very positive having no less than average 3 (neutral value), and the general opinion and the average general features above or equal to 4.The general opinion was pretty consistent with only three variables in the standard deviation was higher than 1. That said we think the conclusions to be drawn must be based just on what should be improved.
Regarding the overall structure of the forum, the structure that had worse price was Deskthority Bottom Bar which had 3 negative responses, one of the worst. also presented much indifference, with 13 responses neutral value.
On the general features of the forum the issues with worse prices were the find, edit, remove topics or posts and should be the first features to be improved.
Regarding the features of the members considered worse was to find members taking
even a minimum score of response. All features of this category had several answers negative value (<3 values).
Broadly should be noted that the 27 replies on the ease of use only one was neutral, and all the other higher.[/spoiler]
Also in the last pages you can get the R script and a copy of the .csv file
Critics & Suggestions (From members)
-Needs dark themes and multi-quotes
-In my opinion there should be a tab next to "Spy, Top topics Wiki, IRC, search" which lists all the threads i took part at. I dont want to be notified about each topic i answerd per mail, but to see them would be a really nice feature.
The site is quite good in its current incarnation. There are a few things that could be streamlined, such as images being auto-spoilered in quotes and the spy functionality putting some oddball things on the feed.
-messaging could be improved and marketplace is very hard to understand
-As far as forums go, it’s a pretty good implementation. phpBB tables remain a living nightmare (adding tabular content to a post is for all extents and purposes simply impossible), and there are some weird bugs relating to time zones when not logged in (like "Last post: Today, 23:50" at 08:25 — the man with a really long scarf called and wants a word) but generally, not much to complain about.
