deskthority

@i$: Exactly. I don't expect Amazon to die anytime soon either. Shop where you want. Compute how you want. But don't expect everyone else to stop what they're doing and follow. Dodgy working practices like Amazon are easier for people to understand than the need for them to know their way around a terminal. Yet few people take a stand on either.


@Halvar: Don't confuse open source with free software. Stallman doesn't!

https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-sou ... point.html


Incidentally, I like Stallman's dedication and agree with the consistency of his ideas. But I have zero interest in following them. I use and love Mac OS X! He gets the same approval as Karl Marx in my mind. I'm not a Marxist either, but he was a smart cookie who created a nice legendarium.

Don't even get me started on big pharma, a cure you cannot use or is too expensive is pointless you may as well not have it. Unless your rich then you don't care.

It should all be done with public money, i would even be happy to pay more tax to support it, then again that conservative asshole would horde it all in his piggy bank.

I bet I'm the only one who banned eBay, PayPal and Amazon.

I don't see how it's getting political, I just entered the thread to bring in a different opinion. IMO Stallman is a fundamentalist who's just taking it too far in some respects. Yes, I didn't mean Google Mail's Javascript code that you can view but not use, but of course I meant free software that I have respect for.

Halvar wrote: I don't see how it's getting political, I just entered the thread to bring in a different opinion. IMO Stallman is a fundamentalist who's just taking it too far in some respects. Yes, I didn't mean Google Mail's Javascript code that you can view but not use, but of course I meant free software that I have respect for.

In many ways i agree with you as well , he takes it too far, but his goal is one that in an ideal world we would want to get to. Buts that not going to happen, so get as close to it as we can. As much open/ free/ GPL software as possible, whist maintaining a fair system when it comes to proprietary software.

Thats my view anyway.

andrewjoy wrote: Don't even get me started on big pharma, a cure you cannot use or is too expensive is pointless you may as well not have it. Unless your rich then you don't care.

The patent system protects the investment for 20 years, then it's free for everyone to use, and it must be published to get a patent in the first place (in the form of the patent).

I really don't want to defend the really bad implications of the patent system in recent times (or capitalism in general, for tha matter), but in my opinion, without patents and without "unfree" software, like it or not, we would be nowhere near where we are today in technology.

20 years is too long in computers patents are supposed to promote innervation but in the software ( and hardware) world they are having the opposite effect

That's true. I agree with both of your posts.

Yeah, patent reform is something even lots of Apple devs and users want. Patent trolls like Nathan Myhrvold are symptoms of a broken system. But the David vs. Goliath / Thomas Edison fable is strong, and most normal people support patents.

derp

And Bill Gates restyled himself from corporate sociopath to reddit clickbaiting philanthropist.

you know what scares me to death? Hospital PCs with Windows.

Health care should be open source. Watch this video if you fancy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFZGpES-St8

well worth 14 minutes of your life.

I love Stallman's ideas but he is an extremist and takes it too far. People are not gonna be sold on using outdated gear for the sake of a FOSS bootloader, and they are especially not going to be sold that idea by someone who conducts himself in such a way. His manner of dress, and his speeches and demenor make it hard to take him seriously at times, despite the fact that he is 100% right on a whole ton of things. Like for real, hire a spokesman or someone else and go back tot he gnu/temple and do the heavy thinking.

derp

I got him to come talk at my uni before.
In the middle of the talk, he sat down, took off his shoes and socks, and started rubbing lotion into his feet.
His ideals are on point though :p

We should invite Stallman as a cameo to announce winners at the next Deskthority Awards. After all he is a known lisp keyboard pioneer and hhkb pro user. That's what really matters to us!

I thought he just liked the original HHKB, I didn't realise it was a Pro.

But what about if he objects to the winners? Or rather "when".

I didn't realise the HHKB runs free and open firmware! It better do to earn a spot in his kit.

Muirium wrote: I didn't realise the HHKB runs free and open firmware! It better do to earn a spot in his kit.

FALCON PUNCH!!!

scottc wrote: I thought he just liked the original HHKB, I didn't realise it was a Pro.

It's a white pro.
He whipped it out in Ben's sitting room :p

Wow, there you go.

One of us, one of us, one of us...

we should build him a custom, open source HHKB clone.

I actually mailed the other guy once about keyboards, but he didn't answer.

https://plus.google.com/+EricRaymond/posts/Y45ArZNTswj

Halvar wrote: IMO Stallman is a fundamentalist who's just taking it too far in some respects.

I am inclined to agree with you but sometimes I think that the world really needs fundamentalists that pull the world harder towards the middle to counter the fundamentalists pulling from the other side.

I have released software under the GNU GPL because I find it to be incredibly useful. For some software. But hardly for all.

webwit wrote: I actually mailed the other guy once about keyboards, but he didn't answer.

https://plus.google.com/+EricRaymond/posts/Y45ArZNTswj

Apparently, he uses Unicomp. http://youtu.be/1NTrQ1JM3KY?t=21s