Posted: 20 Dec 2016, 13:49
Awesome idea XMIT ... maybe we can bring a vendor in here to get things moving!
Phase 2 should have black and white keycaps
Phase 2 should have black and white keycaps
mechanical keyboard authority
http://www.deskthority.net/
If you paid for a kit that's presented as a more or less faithful replica of the original Space Cadet, and then found out that the legends had been made too small due to the mistakes of one or several of the parties involved – would you really have been OK with still paying the full price in the hopes of being able to sell it? I highly doubt all buyers would come to that conclusion (although some might).
But there's no way of knowing who falls into that group – 7bit would presumably have to cancel all orders for which he has not been given updates from the collectors, despite having recieved some of the money. Those people would then need to dispute their PayPal payments. Some of them might get their money back, and some won't. The fallout will be that there are people who have paid money they can't get it back, but get their orders cancelled anyway. And 7bit ending up with a pile of money without anyone's name on it. I don't see how that solves anything.infodroid wrote:The goal of this proposal is to raise sufficient funds to produce Phase 2. If sufficient funds can be raised just by cancelling 180 days orders and writing off the remaining amount to the unresponsive collectors, then it is a viable option that should be considered. If it works, then everybody will still receive exactly what they ordered or all their money back.caligo wrote: And what then of the people who paid more than 180 days ago, and cannot get their money back from PayPal? And what about the money 7bit actually has received? Should he send that back to the (unreliable) PayPal collector and just hope they refund whoever sent it in the first place? I don't think there's a solution to this that does not involve the former collectors cooperating to sort things out, unfortunately.
7bit wrote: These are packed:
0057
0090
0104
0113
0132
0146
0180
0183
0285
0292
0307
0339
0399
0406
0416
0418
0421
0431
0439
0459
0460
0462
0463
0465
0474
0476
0480
0485
0531
0536
0540
0542
0544
0547
0555
0567
0572
0581
0585
0586
0592
0598
0599
0602
0603
0604
0609
0613
0621
0626
0628
0634
0642
0656
0658
0683
0684
0696
0697
0705
0715
0731
0734
0740
0745
0755
0760
0765
0766
0772
0789
0792
0798
0800
0810
0822
0828
0831
0837
0850
0854
0858
0872
0873
0884
0886
0890
0891
0892
0894
0908
0910
0913
0918
0936
0941
0951
0974
0985
1018
1061
I don't know if there's any way of actually answering that question. More base kits would mean more novelties and extras selling, which would contribute to getting rid of all those leftovers. But I suspect it's hard to say how much leftovers would be sold that way. And the extra TKL kits themselves only finance their own production.
Have you really understood the proposal?caligo wrote:But there's no way of knowing who falls into that group – 7bit would presumably have to cancel all orders for which he has not been given updates from the collectors, despite having recieved some of the money. Those people would then need to dispute their PayPal payments. Some of them might get their money back, and some won't. The fallout will be that there are people who have paid money they can't get it back, but get their orders cancelled anyway. And 7bit ending up with a pile of money without anyone's name on it. I don't see how that solves anything.infodroid wrote:The goal of this proposal is to raise sufficient funds to produce Phase 2. If sufficient funds can be raised just by cancelling 180 days orders and writing off the remaining amount to the unresponsive collectors, then it is a viable option that should be considered. If it works, then everybody will still receive exactly what they ordered or all their money back.caligo wrote: And what then of the people who paid more than 180 days ago, and cannot get their money back from PayPal? And what about the money 7bit actually has received? Should he send that back to the (unreliable) PayPal collector and just hope they refund whoever sent it in the first place? I don't think there's a solution to this that does not involve the former collectors cooperating to sort things out, unfortunately.
There is no such risk. If you know of anybody that has failed to recover their funds within the dispute window, I would like to know about it and find out what they did wrong.
This happens to me too...
How long have these collectors been MIA? It sounds like it's been months. If there's been no contact, not even a "hey, sorry I've been MIA, <terrible thing> happened, I'll send an update in <time period>" for 3 months then I wouldn't hold my breath.caligo wrote: But there's no way of knowing who falls into that group – 7bit would presumably have to cancel all orders for which he has not been given updates from the collectors, despite having recieved some of the money. Those people would then need to dispute their PayPal payments. Some of them might get their money back, and some won't. The fallout will be that there are people who have paid money they can't get it back, but get their orders cancelled anyway. And 7bit ending up with a pile of money without anyone's name on it. I don't see how that solves anything.
In response to a question about whether Round 6 kits will ship with Round 7, 7bit said that they will ship separately. Or at least that's what I interpret.
You also have (5) people who have paid more than 180 days ago, but have not had that information passed on to 7bit/7bot. E.g. people like eddible a few post back:infodroid wrote: /…/
With respect to payments to unresponsive or unavailable collectors, there are four major cases:
(1) people who have not paid for any items
(2) people who have fully paid less than 180 days ago, but the collector has not updated 7bot
(3) people who have fully paid and the collector has updated 7bot
(4) people who have paid for some items, but have either not paid for the remaining items or the collector has not updated 7bot
Neither I nor you know how many people fall into the respective categories – what you're listing are plausible scenarios, but everything beyond that is just guesswork on our part. If there are one or two people in category (5) it might not be that big a deal. But what if there are more?
Well, they've both been online fairly recently according to their DT profiles. I honestly don't know what the story is with that, but they're not MIA in the full sense of the word. Which is somewhat reassuring, at least. I don't think it's that naïve to hope for a resolution if the whole PayPal thing – which is another reason to not start cancelling orders.
I agree: we would need to have those numbers in order to say anything substantial about how one could go about solving this problem. But I don't think people can be expected to follow this thread closely or pay that much attention to the invoices. The discussion here has a quite low signal-to-noise-ratio, and 7bot keeps sending invoices whether you've paid or not – I can totally see someone placing their order, sending money through PayPal, and then just missing the whole circus that's been going on here on DT.xtr0n wrote: It would be nice to know the dollar amount of unpaid orders and the dollar amount of disputed orders where disputed orders is defined as: orders where the buyer claims that they paid but there is no confirmation that they paid (i.e. the bot doesn't say that they paid).
If someone paid and the bot has consistently and clearly said that they didn't pay I would expect them to say something about it. If so, we can conclude that anyone who is marked as unpaid and who hasn't said anything really hasn't paid and forfeits their order (after some reasonable time of non-payment).
It would also be interesting to see the amount of money received for unspecified orders vs. the amount of money in disputed orders (as defined above). If the amounts are roughly equal, then we have our answer. If the money received is less than the disputes, release all but the disputed orders. If the money received is significantly more than the disputes, I'd worry that there may be a bunch of people who paid but don't realize that they aren't marked as paid.
I think I ordered and paid for my caps through mashby back in April and the bot says that I'm all paid up, so I suspect that the window where things went south is pretty small relative to the time that R6 has been open.
Yeah, I think it's probably reasonable to expect things to be somewhat slower on 7bits end for a while.
Now you are just trolling. No person is stupid enough to ignore six months of reminder emails saying they have not paid, when they have actually paid money to a collector. eddible is not such a person, his payments was recorded just after a delay, but he just wanted a refund due to the uncertainty. This shows you are mainly interested in clogging up this discussion thread with drivel instead of actually being helpful.caligo wrote:You also have (5) people who have paid more than 180 days ago, but have not had that information passed on to 7bit/7bot. E.g. people like eddible a few post back:infodroid wrote: /…/
With respect to payments to unresponsive or unavailable collectors, there are four major cases:
(1) people who have not paid for any items
(2) people who have fully paid less than 180 days ago, but the collector has not updated 7bot
(3) people who have fully paid and the collector has updated 7bot
(4) people who have paid for some items, but have either not paid for the remaining items or the collector has not updated 7botNeither I nor you know how many people fall into the respective categories – what you're listing are plausible scenarios, but everything beyond that is just guesswork on our part. If there are one or two people in category (5) it might not be that big a deal. But what if there are more?
Yes, that's probably a reasonable assumption – I ordered all those keycaps just to get an excuse to derail a forum thread for my own personal amusement. "Drivel", is that where we're at? Seriously? Sod off mate, I'm not in the mood for this.infodroid wrote:Now you are just trolling. No person is stupid enough to ignore six months of reminder emails saying they have not paid, when they have actually paid money to a collector. eddible is not such a person, his payments was recorded just after a delay, but he just wanted a refund due to the uncertainty. This shows you are mainly interested in clogging up this discussion thread with drivel instead of actually being helpful.caligo wrote:You also have (5) people who have paid more than 180 days ago, but have not had that information passed on to 7bit/7bot. E.g. people like eddible a few post back:infodroid wrote: /…/
With respect to payments to unresponsive or unavailable collectors, there are four major cases:
(1) people who have not paid for any items
(2) people who have fully paid less than 180 days ago, but the collector has not updated 7bot
(3) people who have fully paid and the collector has updated 7bot
(4) people who have paid for some items, but have either not paid for the remaining items or the collector has not updated 7botNeither I nor you know how many people fall into the respective categories – what you're listing are plausible scenarios, but everything beyond that is just guesswork on our part. If there are one or two people in category (5) it might not be that big a deal. But what if there are more?
Wait, are you implying that that there's a long wait to get keycaps here?Parjánya wrote:So by my calculations 7bit is packing 5 orders a day, 100 every 20 days. The first orders must be considerably larger than the last ones but, assuming this rate would continue, my order will be shipped in 127 days, hah.