

Yes.iamwhoiam wrote: Come on guys, are you truly fulfilled to the depths of your hearts, by deriding and upsetting others?
On that I say that it's also used as a sink-hole, to drain the drama from the threads- to keep those a bit more concise and on point. That ethic is not so shabby imho.iamwhoiam wrote:what kind of moderator ethic allows a deliberately aggressive and offensive thread like this, to perpetuate?
Typed while GOING COMMANDO! on my Filco Camo keyboard.Gough's behaviour is obviously unusual. But abnormal is not the same thing as criminal. While he has been adjudged to have broken the law, it's hard to see what crime he has committed. Any society that thinks prison is the correct place for him has lost grip of a basic principle of liberty. "Man is born free," wrote Rousseau, "but everywhere he is in chains."
Cave anas is the kind of moderator ethic that lets my biggus dickus swing! Somebody let me know if the German moderators go online.Just out of interest... what kind of moderator ethic allows a deliberately aggressive and offensive thread like this, to perpetuate? This is not nice, and it would be unwise to encourage this to continue. We all get uptight, but ENCOURAGING people to attack one another? Really really silly.
Logic failure.off wrote:On that I say that it's also used as a sink-hole, to drain the drama from the threads- to keep those a bit more concise and on point. That ethic is not so shabby imho.iamwhoiam wrote:what kind of moderator ethic allows a deliberately aggressive and offensive thread like this, to perpetuate?
Speak English motherfucker.silat wrote:ripster wrote:I'll start on this fucking moron then.
Sorry for the late reply..silat wrote:LOL now you are being funny. By funny I mean I am finally laughing at you.
You break your toys then run away from gh because gh will not bow down to you. Then you announce that you are going to OCN and on your way out the door leave a nasty note on the wiki.
And you run to OCN?
My point?
Now you are going to play like you are a stupid idiot?
How typical.
+1 on the filterIcarium wrote:We can have a glossywhite award for people who make everyone talk about something else than keyboards...
The glossywhite award will apply a filter to your avatar to make it look bright and shiny XD
If you want to call that "science", then in such a context you have to first define "arousal". The experiment just says that the test persons are "aroused", but not that they actually "like" what they see - "arousal" can as well describe "being horrified".silat wrote:Ill let the science do the talking:
For 25 years U of Ga researchers have recruited the most homophobic men on campus to watch gay porn while blood pressure cuffs record their arousal. Consistently the phobes are aroused, while gay-friendly men aren't.
Anti-gay behavior is actually the surest confession of homosexual impulses.
You spend an awful lot of time bringing up homosexuals. Time to come to grip with your sexual ID issues bub.
Would you really say the last sentence is a scientific conclusion for such an experiment?Researchers have recruited the most engaged death penalty abolitionists to watch capital execution videos while blood pressure cuffs record their arousal. Consistently the abolitionists are aroused, while death penalty supporters aren't.
Opposition to death penalty is actually the surest confession of death penalty supporting impulses.