










You might have the EK edition with the red LEDs. Brian from EK had Topre fix the legends on the 'Enter' key and the 'Backspace' key for that specific model.
You know, someone from the Toronto meet up on the 18th also told me that you can't compare Topre with beam springs. Now that it has been independently corroborated, I won't go down this avenue.seebart wrote: I don't really believe it's possible to compare Topre to Beamspring 1:1. I'd say the tactility is quite a bit more refined on Topre compared to either of my BTC's, where the BTC 5100 FF is actually nicer in tactility to me. I don't find any "mushy" feel at the bottom of key travel, but obviously it's normal for users to experience it differnetly. On long typing sessions I prefer the 45g of my FC660C to the 55g of my RF. If I ever get a full size Topre I'd have to go with 45g for productivity.
You should not listen too much to what others say...but one is 40 years old and clicky the other is a modern very expensive refined "rubber dome".y11971alex wrote: You know, someone from the Toronto meet up on the 18th also told me that you can't compare Topre with beam springs. Now that it has been independently corroborated, I won't go down this avenue.
I would be hesitant to use the word "refined" to describe tactility, but it does seem a very thoughtfully contrived force curve. Still not as good as beam springs though.
If like black as color, open your wallet http://www.keyboardco.com/keyboard/germ ... yboard.asp
Agreed, it is an apples-to-oranges comparison. I prefer to use beamspring at home where annoying others is not an issue. But at work, I go with the Realforce because of noise and it doesn't look like this giant crazy vintage keyboard.seebart wrote: I don't really believe it's possible to compare Topre to Beamspring 1:1. I'd say the tactility is quite a bit more refined on Topre compared to either of my BTC's, where the BTC 5100 FF is actually nicer in tactility to me. I don't find any "mushy" feel at the bottom of key travel, but obviously it's normal for users to experience it differnetly. On long typing sessions I prefer the 45g of my FC660C to the 55g of my RF. If I ever get a full size Topre I'd have to go with 45g for productivity.
Most of the development side of our office are using Realforces now and the support guys pop over from time to time and I've heard them say "what's with the vintage keyboards?". But I guess most of them are in their 20's, so they have a different idea of what vintage is
I found this weird too. @y11971alex, I think people normally just call this the Realforce 87u.romevi wrote: These are probably the best readily available boards--stock--right now, however.
I didn't like my Realforce the first time. Sold it after a month, but during that time without it I kept yearning for it again. I bought another and haven't considered otherwise since. I now compare every board I get to the Realforce, which probably isn't wise.
And stop calling it SSK! Nomenclature considers SSK as IBM boards, normally.
But that is such an unexciting name.emdude wrote:I found this weird too. @y11971alex, I think people normally just call this the Realforce 87u.romevi wrote: These are probably the best readily available boards--stock--right now, however.
I didn't like my Realforce the first time. Sold it after a month, but during that time without it I kept yearning for it again. I bought another and haven't considered otherwise since. I now compare every board I get to the Realforce, which probably isn't wise.
And stop calling it SSK! Nomenclature considers SSK as IBM boards, normally.
There is only one SSK y11971alex and it's far from any Topre.y11971alex wrote:But that is such an unexciting name.emdude wrote:I found this weird too. @y11971alex, I think people normally just call this the Realforce 87u.romevi wrote: These are probably the best readily available boards--stock--right now, however.
I didn't like my Realforce the first time. Sold it after a month, but during that time without it I kept yearning for it again. I bought another and haven't considered otherwise since. I now compare every board I get to the Realforce, which probably isn't wise.
And stop calling it SSK! Nomenclature considers SSK as IBM boards, normally.
To be fair, the design of the Realforce is vintage at this point. A reduction of the bezel size without a reduction in quality would be a welcome change, but Realforce is basically the only player in the the market of high end electrostatic capacitive keyboards, so what's the point in an update, really.
but i love that big bezelvivalarevolución wrote:To be fair, the design of the Realforce is vintage at this point. A reduction of the bezel size without a reduction in quality would be a welcome change, but Realforce is basically the only player in the the market of high end electrostatic capacitive keyboards, so what's the point in an update, really.