
Ivanka is smarter, but she’s long ago sold her soul for a piece of future inheritance.
Because the president-elect values greatly what his children have it say about matters, that was covered during the campaign.
It's because the things he says have inspired a great deal of hate speech and hate crimes directed at people already, and many of the groups he has spoken ill about are genuinely scared that they will be further targeted. His rhetoric is having very real effects for very real people. It's the fact that white supremecists feel empowered and emboldened by this election, that this is their man. Hate speech, misogyny, vague racism, and various other hateful tactics are becoming normalized. One thing I have noticed is that people not a part of the groups that were a subject of his rhetoric don't seem to understand how others are scared or have already been targeted.002 wrote: This thread is salty as fuck now
On the surface his kids seemed OK in that 60 minutes interview. Definitely Ivanka comes across as the smartest and most well-adjusted but who really knows how the others are. They are all super defensive and seem genuinely proud of their dad though and honestly I am finding it pretty hard to believe that Don is just iron fist mode all the time with his kids. Has anyone else seen Faherty's interview of Donald?
There are some bits there that give me a bit of insight into how Trump acts when he's a bit more relaxed...I think he's just a bant-lord and likes to joke around and swear and make lude jokes like most guys do. None of this throw-away comments have ever really offended me personally -- even his really "risqué" comments would me mild compared to the stuff my work colleagues and I joke about on a daily basis. I don't agree with all of his policies but I don't understand the raging hate-on's that a lot seem to have for him as a person.
I'm not sure if you're serious or haven't paid much attention to the rhetoric during the campaign or what.
The refrain that he has not gone after law abiding American citizens is one I hear often and somewhat irrelevant, because one man can only do so much, but in a position of power he can have a lot of influence over others. Many acts of hate or violence or property damage are being conducted against law abiding American citizens, inspired by his election and rhetoric. It's the same sort of thing we saw after Brexit.002 wrote: Just say what it is, mate.
Don't give me the Carl the Cuck response which is "r u fucking kidding me!?"
I can't believe that people are quaking in their boots over anything Trump said...I don't remember him ever pointing out that he was going after innocent, law-abiding American citizens...but I am happy to be proven otherwise.
They are doing so now in particular since he will be chief in commander at least the next four years, oh look here he is getting his first ideas...
And not just.
Alright tough guy. Beliefs and opinions often lead to actions. That's the underpinning of the idea of a thought crime, and it's very successful in influencing people's actions (for example voting decisions). Pence's discriminatory actions as a politician support his beliefs, and the dozens of women allegedly assaulted by the president-elect may also have suffered from his actions. I suppose that women subject to assault should simply brush that off and vote differently.002 wrote:![]()
Should have known I'd get a wall of text from Mr Facts (aka jacob). You focus a lot on peoples beliefs and opinions and little on their actions. I don't care if Pence is delusional enough to think that gay conversion therapy works, or Trump hurt your fragile little feelings because he said he'd grab a pussy or says he's going to do this and that...
You live in a democracy to prevent such things from getting traction. If you were president elect, there would be a million and one things that make you *WRONG*, and a cunt to somebody with a different opinion.
That unfortunately is true, Clinton ran her campaign like a conceited winner from the beginning. But that's not what killed it for her, rather all the political "skeletons in her closet" and Bill's shit on top of that. She was one of the single most self-handicapped candidates ever, so jaded that a clownish fat disgusting uneducated businessman with zero political experience could win. Now if Bernie would have been the democratic candidate...
seebart wrote:That unfortunately is true, Clinton ran her campaign like a conceited winner from the beginning. But that's not what killed it for her, rather all the political "skeletons in her closet" and Bill's shit on top of that. She was one of the single most self-handicapped candidates ever, so jaded that a clownish fat disgusting uneducated businessman with zero political experience could win. Now if Bernie would have been the democratic candidate...
NO ONE needs to be ashamed here or "pushing" any argument! Possibly you should for suggesting so...live with it that you now got a clownish fat disgusting uneducated businessman with zero political experience for president. Of course you could "argue" another 95890234534905683495902 lines but if you have a 3-month-old baby to feed you might want to prioritize...